Thursday, May 29, 2008

Bruno Weighs Gay Marriage Directive

ALBANY — As New House Of House Of York lawmakers pondered a new directive from Gov. that state federal agencies get revising their policies to honour same-sex marriages conducted outside New York, the Legislature’s top Republican said he had yet to make up one's mind whether to dispute the governor.

Nathaniel Van Wyck Brooks for The New House Of York Times


Gov. Saint David A. Paterson, shown at a news conference on budget issues on Wednesday, may force to legalize same-sex unions.

Related (May 29, 2008)

Jesse James Rajotte for The New House Of House Of York Times


A lawsuit involving Patricia Martinez and Lisa Golden was cited in the directive changing policies on cheery labor unions in New York.

, the bulk leader of the State Senate, said Thursday morning time that he was surprised by the governor’s order but had not yet read it.

“I’m not going to second-guess it because I haven’t seen it,” Mr. Giordano Bruno said. “I don’t cognize the branchings of this.”

On May 14, Mr. Paterson’s legal counsel, Saint David Nocenti, wrote a memorandum to all state federal agency caputs that directed them to measure their policies and get rewriting them so they follow with a state entreaties tribunal determination that said New House Of York must acknowledge cheery matrimonies performed in other legal powers like Canada and California.

At a news conference on Thursday afternoon, Mr. William Patterson repeated the directive and said that although helium back ups cheery matrimony and will go on to force for it in the future, this was not an “end tally around the Legislature” but merely his reading of current laws on the books.

“I’m followers the law as it always have existed,” he said.

Asked to react to critics of the directive, helium said, “I would propose that if they went back and read the law, that they would come up to a different reading themselves, even if they differ with the conception of matrimony equality.

“If Iodine didn’t take this action,” he added, “I would go forth this state unfastened to law suits. I would go forth the state exchequer unfastened to pecuniary damages.” Mr. Giordano Bruno said Thursday that he and his staff would look at whether the governor had violated the bank checks and balances that base between the executive director and the legislative branches. But he stopped short of saying that Mr. Paterson, A Democrat, had overstepped his authority.

“There’s a constitutional inquiry here,” Mr. Giordano Bruno added. Relations between Mr. Giordano Bruno and Mr. William Patterson have got been especially affable since the governor took over from former Gov. inch March.

Mr. William Patterson reiterated his support for a cheery matrimony bill. “Some of those dizzy legislators who believe I’m doing an end run, maybe they should travel into the Legislature and actually work on it,” helium said. The policy alterations are most likely to affect as many as 1,300 legislative acts and ordinances in New House Of York government everything from joint filing of income taxation tax returns to transferring fishing licences between spouses.

In A videotaped message given to cheery community leadership at a dinner on May 17, Mr. William Patterson described the move as “a strong measure toward matrimony equality.” And people on both sides of the issue said it moved the state closer to fully legalizing same-sex labor labor labor unions in this state.

“Very shortly, there will be 100s and 100s and hundreds, and probably one one one thousands and thousands and thousands of cheery people who have got got their matrimonies recognized by the state,” said Assemblyman Daniel O’Donnell, a Democrat who stands for the Upper Berth Occident Side and have pushed for legalisation of cheery unions.

Massachusetts and Golden State are the lone states that have legalized cheery marriage, while others, including New Jersey and Vermont, let civil unions. Forty-one state-supporteds have got laws limiting matrimony as a labor union between a adult male and a woman.

Legal experts said Mr. Paterson’s determination would do New House Of York the lone state that did not itself let cheery matrimony but fully recognized same-sex labor labor unions entered into elsewhere.

The directive is the strongest signaling yet that Mr. Paterson, who developed strong neckties to the cheery community as a legislator, programs to force aggressively to legalize same-sex unions as governor. His predecessor, Mr. Spitzer, introduced a measure last twelvemonth that would have got legalized cheery marriage, but even as he submitted it, doubted that it would pass. The Democratic-dominated Assembly passed the measure, but the Republican-led Senate have refused to name a ballot on it.

Short of an enactment by the Legislature, the directive ordered by Mr. William Patterson is the 1 of the strongest statements a state can make in favour of cheery unions.

“Basically we’ve done everything we can do on matrimony legislatively at this point,” said Sean Saint Patrick Maloney, a senior advisor to Mr. Paterson. “But there are tools in our tool kit on the executive director side, and this is one.” One

Danny Hakim contributed reporting from Capital Of New House Of York and Anahad O'Connor and Tina Kelley from New York.

Sunday, May 25, 2008

Danish Prince Weds French Woman in Second Marriage (Update1)

Denmark's , the second
son of sovereign , married Marie Cavallier of
France, three old age after he divorced his first wife.

Joachim, 38, dabbed crying from his eyes and then kissed his
two boys as Cavallier, 32, entered the ,
located in southern Kingdom Of Denmark near the prince's manor. Guests at
the nationally televised ceremonial included Swedish , Norse and the British actor
.

Joachim divorced in 2005 from Hong Kong-born , World Health Organization subsequently have remarried and thus lost her royal
title. Today, Cavallier received the statute title ''Her Royal Highness
Princess Marie'' and joined Europe's oldest .

In his homily, said to the
couple that they ''have, inch different ways, experienced divorces,
and you have got got been in love with others before you met.'' Helium added:
''You naturally have deliberated carefully before deciding to say
'yes' to each other in the full visible light of publicity.''

Cavallier wore an off-white nuptial gown lined with ivory
silk faille that was designed by Saint David Arasa and Claudio Morelli
from the manner house Arasa Morelli, the royal tribunal said in a
statement. Joachim wore a formal Danish foot uniform. Medals
and a sky blueness window sash were draped across his naval forces blueness tunic.

French Father

Joachim, the little blood brother of Danish , have dated Cavallier since 2005. They announced their
engagement in October. She have go a Danish citizen and
converted to Denmark's state faith, Lutheranism, from Roman-
Catholicism.

Marie, born in Paris, is the youngest of five siblings. She
moved to Swiss Confederation as a adolescent to go to a boarding school
and have lived in that state for most of her grownup life. Since
2001, she have worked at her father's Geneva-based investment
company, according to Danish broadcaster TV2. Her parents are
divorced.

, whose father is from France,
speaks fluent French.

''In malice of great differences in the manner you grew up, you
share much in your backgrounds that volition lend to a rich and
stimulating life for the two of you,'' Bishop Svendsen said in
his remarks. ''You already share the Gallic linguistic communication and you both
take pleasance in Gallic culture.''

Royal Wages

The Danish parliament last calendar month decided to increase the
prince's annual pay by 40 percentage to 2.9 million kroner
($612,000) to assist him back up his new wife.

After the ceremony, the couple were scheduled to throw a
private dinner response at Joachim's Schackenborg manor. Joachim's and Manley's 1995 response was televised and held at
the Fredensborg palace North of Copenhagen, where Denmark's
traditionally throw their greatest household events.

Joachim have joint detention with Manley of their two sons
, 8, and Prince Felix, 5.

Joachim's blood brother Frederik, 39, married Australian-born
inch 2004 and have two children.

To reach the newsmen on this story:
in Kobenhavn at

Saturday, May 24, 2008

Trash and Politics Italian Style

Trash and Politics Italian Style
Friday May 23, 3:00 americium ET

Friday, May 23, 2008

Syngenta and Monsanto end legal dispute over crop technologies

: Swiss agrochemicals company Syngenta said Friday it have resolved a legal difference with U.S.-rival Monsanto over their several maize and soyabean businesses.

Syngenta said it will retreat antimonopoly and violation lawsuits related to Monsanto's usage of herbicide-tolerant and insect-protected corn technologies, and herbicide-tolerant soybean technology.

In return, Monsanto will licence Syngenta's engineering for making harvests immune to the weedkiller Dicamba.

Syngenta will also licence one of Monsanto's "Roundup Ready" engineerings for increasing soyabean yield.

The two companies agreed to collaborate in developing new herbicide-tolerant and insect-protection products for the cultivation of corn, cotton wool and soybeans. Today in Business with Reuters

Syngenta shares rose 1.5 percentage to 324.75 Swiss francs (US$315.80; €200.44) on the Zurich exchange.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Polk Co. files response in same-sex marriage case

DES MOINES, Ioway (AP) -- The James Polk County attorney's business business office states in new written documents that a lawsuit challenging the state's same-sex matrimony prohibition is trying to change the manner populace policy is made.The lawsuit have got led to a series of filings in which the county attorney's office and a New York-based cheery rights organisation have answered one another's legal arguments.Lambda Legal filed the lawsuit in 2005 on behalf of six cheery and gay woman couples from Ioway who were denied matrimony licenses, as well as three of the couples' children. It name calling former James James Polk County recording equipment and registrar Timothy Brien.The lawsuit prompted a opinion last August by Polk County District Court Judge Henry Martin Robert Hanson, who said the state law allowing matrimony only between a adult male and a adult female go againsts the constitutional rights of owed procedure and equal protection.The next day, Hanson stayed the decision, and the lawsuit is now before the Ioway Supreme Court.Challengers of the same-sex matrimony prohibition postulate it go againsts gays' rights. Opponents said the issue should be left up to the Legislature to do up one's mind -- not the courts.In its answer legal little filed on Tuesday, the county attorney's business office said that Lambda Legal seeks to have got got the judicial subdivision set populace policy, instead of leaving it to lawmakers."Plaintiffs seek to have this tribunal set up that the tribunals and not the Legislature should make public policy for the State of Ioway by redefining matrimony to be something totally different from what it have ever seen," the little said.Among its arguments, the brief criticises Lambda Legal's analogy between homosexuals seeking the right to get married and Iowa's judicial history of guaranteeing rights for achromatic Americans. The little said other tribunals have got rejected similar arguments."This is because the histories of achromatic Americans simply are not remotely the same as plaintiffs," the little said. "The fundamental laws of the United States and the state of Ioway make not advert homosexuality."The little also reasons that the tribunal erred in rejecting some of the county's witnessers who were to have got testified about the nature of matrimony and the best state of affairs in which to raise children. It said the witnessers should be allowed because their testimony is something the Legislature could believe as portion of statements to continue procreative marriage, which it called "a rational footing for the (Iowa) law."The county attorney's business office said Lambda Legal also tried to asseverate that the county's statements are simply based on morals."Plaintiffs mistake culture, history and spiritual beliefs," the little said. "Defendant (Brien) have addressed that his witnessers testified from historical and anthropological research, not a substance of faith."Camilla Taylor, the Lambda Legal lawyer representing the same-sex couples, issued a statement about the county's brief."We've heard all of these statements before, yet James Polk County have still given no valid justification for excluding same-sex couples and their children from marriage," she said.Oral statements will be scheduled by the Ioway Supreme Court in coming months, but a determination this twelvemonth is unlikely.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

The Public Pressures Publicizing Your Love for Someone

So, hot on the flat, comfy heels of Golden State overturning the cheery matrimony ban, Ellen DeGeneres announced on her show, that she's marrying the stunningly hot Portia Delaware Rossi.

She got a standing standing ovation — and Iodine could state Ellen hasn't been this happy since she professed the same love for Ann Heche, also on TV, a decennary ago. As you know, seeing Ellen happy, do me happy — for everyone should beryllium happy with the 1 they love — be they straight, gay, transgendered, bi-curious, master-slave, S and M, or even Belgian. Especially Belgian. Those suffering assholes rate it.

But Ellen already cognizes that once you publicise your love, it uses undo pressure level on that human relationship to last — even if it's not meant to be. And then, bitterness grows, leading inevitably to something named Coley Laffoon. Such a stupid, stupid name.

The fact is if you ever desire to dwell "happily ever after," you necessitate to close the Hell up about it. Profession one's love publicly only works in sappy commercials, bad movies and perhaps keeps in the East Village where the endurance of your scrotum depends on it. For me, public exhortations of love are no different than telling everyone how great your intestine motions are since switching to All-Bran. No 1 gives a sh_t, except you. Related
Column Archive

Show Info Airs Weekdays at 2 a.m. ET

And so, this is why I never discourse my matrimony with anyone — which is the chief ground why Toilet Stamos and I are so happy together.

And if you differ with me, then you sir are worse than Hitler!

hosts weekdays at 3 a.m. ET. Send your remarks to:

Monday, May 19, 2008

Hurrah for Gay Marriage

Erica Erica Jong
Sun May 18, 3:25 Prime Minister ET

I've never understood the expostulation to cheery marriage. We world are pair-bonding creatures and we look to experience safest when coupled. It's not true for everyone, of course, but most of us eventually desire a spouse to unify our books and lives with. Marriage supplies certain extremely utile perks: a spouse to be with you when you are ill, person to share your poorness or wealthiness with, person to share your jubilations and devastations, person to raise children with. You'd believe the right wing would be pleased that cheery people share the same demands as other Americans.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the past, cheery people had to follow their lovers to go forth them their goodies. Or they had to travel without a next-of-kin to depend on in hospital. All kinds of legal mumbo-jumbo was required because matrimony was forbidden. And why? Because a bigoted old Book seemed to connote that Supreme Being made Adam and Eve -- not Adam and Steve -- as the anti-gay faction wishes to say.


I've often establish that cheery people are better at matrimony than consecutive people. They don't acquire all set out of form about sexual activity for sex's sake. At least this is true for cheery men. And they don't run to flop up a perfectly cosy labor union because one member of the couple -- or both -- have a fling. Some couples are faithful and some not. And they look to drill this without the territoriality and lip service of mixed-sex couples. Actually, they should be our function theoretical accounts in marriage. They take it far more than seriously than consecutive people -- perhaps because it was forbidden for so long.


So hooray for Golden State and Massachusetts. Let's hope the anti-gay moonstruck periphery eventually sees cheery matrimony as a approval not a curse. It certainly advances stableness and family. And it's certainly good for kids.


But the truth is the anti-gays don't believe rationally. They necessitate their wedge shape issues to deflect the public from reality. Anti-gay rhetoric is a utile political smokescreen. It befogs the fact that the rich are getting richer and that cipher gives a hoot about the poor. Whenever people acquire exercised about sexual activity -- fishy the truth: they desire to pick your pocket.